Most firms have a routine for this: a client forwards a failure-to-file notice, someone pulls the standard abatement letter out of the folder, and a few weeks later the penalty comes off. That routine is being retired, and the retirement has already started.
The IRS just made abatement automatic
On July 8, 2026, the IRS announced in IR-2026-83 that a new form of relief called Automatic Exemption from Penalty, or AEP, will replace First Time Abate (FTA). As of July 14, the transition is written into the agency's administrative penalty relief page, so it is now sitting in the guidance your staff reads. The mechanics are simple, and the consequence isn't. The IRS said it will "begin phasing out First Time Abate and transitioning to AEP during the summer of 2026," and that AEP will replace it "for eligible returns with original due dates on or after Jan. 1, 2027." The relief arrives without being asked for: "Taxpayers do not need to take action to receive this relief. If eligible, the IRS will apply AEP and issue a notice confirming that the relief was granted."
Read that with your workflow in mind. The service you've been billing for is the request, and the request is what's going away. The scale is worth knowing. The National Taxpayer Advocate reports that "In fiscal year 2025, nearly 220,000 taxpayers received FTA relief through the manual process," and estimates that had AEP been in place for the same period, "over 1.5 million taxpayers would have received penalty relief." Most of that gap is people who qualified and never asked. Some of them are your clients.
The eligibility test did not move
This is the part that keeps the change manageable. AEP covers the same three penalties: failure to file, failure to pay, and failure to deposit. It uses the same history test. The same return type has to have been timely filed, and any tax due paid, for the prior three years or 12 consecutive quarters, and either no penalty other than the estimated tax penalty was assessed, or one was assessed and later abated for reasonable cause or IRS error.
The eligible returns are the ones your clients actually file: Forms 1040, 1065 and 1120 on the annual side, and 940, 941, 943, 944, 945 and CT-1 on the employment side. Event-based filings and information returns generally are not eligible. So the judgment you were making hasn't changed. What changed is who makes it, and when. The IRS is now making it first, on its own initiative, when the original return finishes processing, before anyone in your office has looked at a notice.
The overlap is where your calls will come from
Between now and January 1, 2027, the two systems run side by side, and the seam is messy enough to generate client phone calls. AEP applies, in the IRS's words, "to eligible original returns beginning with tax year 2025 and 2026 quarterly returns, as well as future tax periods." First Time Abate still applies to eligible 2025 tax year and 2026 quarterly returns that were not considered for AEP, plus all prior years and periods. And the IRS has said plainly that during the phase-out "some qualifying taxpayers may still receive penalty notices," and that those who believe they qualify "may contact the IRS to request First Time Abate."
Translate that for your team: a penalty notice is no longer evidence the client was ineligible. It may only be evidence the notice went out before the automatic process caught up. Treating every notice as a fight to be picked will waste hours this fall.
Relief used is relief spent
Neither the IRS release nor the relief page spells out what happens once this relief has been used. The National Taxpayer Advocate does, and the answer is the part your clients will feel. The worked example, published the same day as the IRS announcement, runs like this. A taxpayer files late in year one for reasons that would have supported reasonable cause relief, and the IRS applies AEP automatically. In year three, the taxpayer files late again, this time without reasonable cause. The Advocate's finding: "In this scenario, the taxpayer loses access to administrative relief in Year 3 because AEP was used in Year 1, even though the taxpayer may have been entitled to reasonable cause relief in Year 1."
The Advocate is blunt about why: "As with FTA, AEP may be applied before the IRS considers whether the taxpayer qualifies for reasonable cause relief." And about what to do: "If you receive a penalty notice and believe the penalty is incorrect or that you qualify for relief, do not assume the IRS has already considered all available options. Contact the IRS and ask." That is the job now. Not writing the letter, but knowing when a client had a reasonable cause argument worth putting on the record instead of letting the cheaper relief be spent on their behalf.
Watch the deposit count on payroll clients
Your payroll clients are the sharpest exposure, and they run through your bookkeeping software every month rather than crossing your desk once a year. The test for quarterly filers is 12 consecutive quarters, a three-year memory with four times as many chances to break it. There is also a ceiling that applies specifically to business taxpayers: relief is unavailable if the IRS waived the failure to deposit penalty four or more times during the prior three years or 12 consecutive quarters, and unavailable where the deposit penalty was charged for avoiding the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System.
Four or more disqualifies, so the working allowance is three. A client who is casually late on deposits is drawing down a balance nobody has been watching, and now nobody will be told when a withdrawal happens.
Change what your team does on Monday
Three changes, none of them heavy.
- Check for an AEP confirmation notice before drafting anything.
- Keep the First Time Abate process alive for prior years and periods.
- Ask clients to forward every IRS notice, including the ones that look like good news.
Then build one list before January 1, 2027. Pull every client who received penalty relief in the last three years, note the year, the penalty type, and whether they file quarterly. That is your at-risk population, and it takes an afternoon. Send those clients one short note. Not a marketing email, a specific one: here is the relief you used, here is the window it affects, here is what a late filing or a late deposit in the next twelve months would now cost.
Price the monitoring, not the letter
The abatement letter was a billable event that showed up after something had already gone wrong. What replaces it is quieter and worth more: a standing check on filing and deposit history, a record of every waiver used, and a client who finds out in month two rather than year three. That is a compliance monitoring service, and it can be priced as one. It is recurring, it is cheap to deliver from data you already hold, and it is the kind of thing a client remembers in March. Every abatement letter your firm wrote was also a conversation about what went wrong and how to stop it happening again. If nobody writes the letter, nobody has the conversation. Put it on the calendar, because the notice is no longer going to put it there for you.
Do you have questions about this article? Email us and let us know > info@woodard.com
Comments: