As your business grows, managing human resources takes more time, becomes more complex, and adds more risk to your business. The solution many accounting and bookkeeping firms turn to is to outsource their HR function to a Professional Employer Organization (PEO). But is a PEO right for you?
Besides considering one for yourself, clients might ask your advice on whether to hire a PEO. Plenty of due diligence goes into the process of hiring one, but before you get that far, learning more about them and weighing the pros and cons can help in your decision.
In the simplest terms, a PEO is an outside, full-service HR department you can use to eliminate the paperwork, compliance, and administrative tasks of managing employees so you can focus on the core services of your firm. The PEO establishes a client service agreement with you that allocates the sharing of certain employer responsibilities between the PEO and your company.
According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), PEOs typically act as the professional employer of their clients’ employees and report wages under the PEO’s FEIN, and the employee liability shifts to the PEO. However, some PEOs let you outsource certain HR functions but skip the co-employment portion of the agreement.
With around 487 PEOs in the U.S., according to the National Association of Professional Employer Organizations (NAPEO), you’ll have plenty to pick from and some choices to make in terms of the type of relationship and services you want. Some of the typical services they provide include:
The idea of handing off the paperwork, stress, and administrative headaches of HR appeals to many small businesses, but is it worth the investment? NAPEO offers a resounding “yes” -- the ROI of using a PEO is 27.3 percent, and, according to their research, businesses in a PEO arrangement grow 7-9 percent faster, have 10-14 percent lower turnover, and are 50 percent less likely to go out of business.
But a PEO isn’t right for every company. There’s more than a monetary investment involved here since HR services are so intertwined with the culture of your business. So careful consideration of the pros and cons is in order:
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
Co-employment reduces legal risks and costs from payroll fines, FMLA violations, etc. |
|
Loss of control of essential processes and people |
Economies of scale and negotiating power can lower benefit rates and help you offer more employee benefits |
|
Potential security issues with the vendor’s system |
Can help to lower your operational costs and reduce overhead |
|
An outside company’s influence on your culture and potential resistance from employees |
Eliminates workers' compensation administration time and offers expertise with tasks like policy selection and safety programs such as return-to-work programs |
Lack of control and security over employee paperwork |
|
Can help you attract and recruit top talent by being able to compete with the types of employee benefits offered by larger firms |
|
Detaches your culture from portions of the recruiting and hiring process |
If you’re considering a PEO, start your search by looking inward and asking yourself which tasks you’ll want to hand off. Having some idea of which functions you want the PEO to perform will help you find the one that’s right for you.
Besides potential cost savings, you’re hiring a PEO to solve a problem, so start by compiling a list of any HR pain points with your current systems and processes. Some considerations to help with your list:
Once you have some idea of what your needs will be, you can start searching for the right PEO. NAPEO offers a PEO search tool to help you find members in your state. Be sure to ask for references and find out whether you’ll be able to meet the people who will be servicing your company. Some other considerations:
Whether you’re thinking about a PEO for your firm or a client’s, keep in mind that hiring one touches the lives of employees, whether it’s their job duties or the benefits they rely on. With worker shortages at unprecedented levels, any decision that affects them can’t be taken lightly.