Most firms have had the advisory conversation more than once. It comes up in a quiet stretch between deadlines, everyone agrees it's the right direction, and someone maybe even drafts a new service page. But once the next filing season arrives, the whole thing gets forgotten. Rinse and repeat.
The problem isn’t a lack of commitment. I believe the real reason advisory efforts are prone to stalling is all about arithmetic, and to break the cycle, you need to take a look at how your work is priced.
That cycle repeats because of how the firm is built underneath. A compliance practice runs on a particular economic engine, based on returns completed, audits issued, and hours billed. Advisory runs on a different one entirely, since what the client buys is your interpretation of the numbers and what to do about them.
If you bolt the second onto the first without changing anything else about how your firm operates, the advisory work will inevitably drift to the edges of the calendar, handled on evenings and weekends until whoever was shouldering the load taps out.
To make a lasting switch to CAS (Client Advisory Services), you have to stop treating advisory as a service you're adding and start treating it as a business you're designing. The accounting world is replete with advisors, guides, whitepapers, LinkedIn posts, and webinars teaching you exactly how. And there’s a reason for that: because it’s much easier said than done.
So if a lack of available information isn’t the obstacle, and neither is a lack of expertise (after all, translating a set of financials and helping a client understand what their options are is the work you've spent a career learning to do well), then what is? Capacity and pricing.
Capacity is the constraint sitting underneath all of this, since a better pricing model only helps if your team has hours available to sell in the first place. As a firm grows, the technology it runs on determines whether that growth creates room to work differently or simply adds to the chaos, which is why the firms that scale advisory successfully treat their stack as infrastructure. Automation has been moving that line for years, absorbing the mechanical work of gathering and reconciling client information, and AI is accelerating it further.
Of course, the point of all that machinery is to give the advisor room to actually advise. A connected system that pulls financial data into one place and automates the routine handoffs gives back the hours your team used to spend chasing information, opening up room for advisory conversations. Remember that capacity built this way compounds, because every hour you stop spending on collection becomes an hour you can price and sell as advisory work, which is what makes the pricing change worth making at all.
Most firms price services around a one-off deliverable. The danger is that you can unintentionally undermine your own value by quietly folding everything you do inside that single number. One-off questions, custom reporting, and strategic planning each create value independently, so a single flat figure means you're delivering three distinct things while charging for one.
Sean Duncan, president and founder of SMD Consulting & Accounting and frequent Canopy contributor, states the case plainly: "Too many accountants price based on what competitors charge, or worse, on the hours they think it will take. That's nonsense."
Hourly billing carries another, newer problem to grapple with. As automation absorbs more of the mechanical work and your team gets faster at what remains, an hourly model turns every efficiency gain into a smaller invoice, which amounts to a pay cut you administer to yourself.
In reality, fixed-fee and value-based arrangements reverse that incentive for both sides, since the client stops paying for elapsed time and starts paying for the result. As Duncan says, "Clients don't care how many hours it took you. They care about the outcome. If you save them $20,000 in taxes, do you think they care if it took you three hours or thirty?"
You don't have to redesign the entire firm this quarter. I recommend two small moves you can finish in a week, which will reveal enough to tell you whether the larger change is worth pursuing.
First, pull your recurring client list and mark everyone who already asks forward-looking questions. Those are the clients whose curiosity has moved past last month's numbers. Reaching them costs you nothing in business development.
Then pick one component of the work and bill it outside the monthly retainer entirely. Start with onboarding. You can price it by itself while every existing client keeps the core fee they already agreed to.
Whether or not advisory scales at your firm comes down to whether the economics underneath it were ever redesigned. Pricing is the piece of that redesign you can start on before the next deadline arrives. Just make sure you don’t stop there.
Sponsored Content: This article is generously brought to you by one of our valued sponsors. Their support enables us to continue delivering expert insights and the latest industry trends to our dedicated community of accounting professionals